
In our
second scenario, three grey-suited executives raid a country. The collapsing
economy has left the government powerless to administer essential services.
Failed crops, internal corruption, and natural disasters have taken
their toll. People are desperate and dying. The IMF and World Bank executives
outline the terms and conditions of the $50 billion loan.

" . . .The terrorists in the first scene are eventually captured
and executed for terrorist crimes. The bankers in the second scene are
rewarded for their successful hijacking of the country's economy."
Their corporations will be paid many times the loan over the next decade.
The debt trap will cripple and imprison the country's future earning
capacity. The executives receive bonuses and promotions that take their
collective salary to a sum greater than the salaries of all the lowest
paid workers in the country they had signed up to the debt trap.
Over the past fifty years, the IMF and the World Bank have forced economic
'development' that benefits the wealthy lenders and multinational corporations
in the industrialized north and enslaves the world's poor majority in
developing and third world countries. These international loan sharks
have hijacked the economies of more than 60 countries. Loans, international
assistance, and debt relief are given only when countries agree to conditions
set by the Bank and Fund. Free trade, market liberalization, and privatisation
of essential resources and services are demanded if 'financial stability'
is to be achieved. While crippling interest payments force cuts in health
care, education and other social services for millions of people around
the globe; the banks and corporations that 'rescued' those countries
report record profits. Humanitarian crises, like wars, have become lucrative
business for those who have money to lend.
Ten years ago, economist J. W. Smith warned, "The size of the debt
trap can be controlled to claim all surplus production of a society,
but if allowed to continue to grow the magic of compound interest dictates
it is unsustainable. The third world debt has been compounding at over
20 percent per year between 1973 and 1993, from $100 billion to $1.5
trillion [only $400 billion of the $1.5 trillion was actually borrowed
money. The rest was runaway compound interest]. If Third World debt
continues to compound at 20 percent per year, the $117 trillion debt
will be reached in eighteen years and the $13.78 quadrillion debt in
thirty-four years."
More shocking than the magnitude of the figures (how does one fathom
a quadrillion dollars?) is the chilling fact that the debt trap robs
all the surplus production of an entire society. Debt does much more
than forcing a country to work for nothing. This form of terrorism punishes
the children, abandons the sick, and enslaves the adults.
Every hour, one Filipino child dies because of debt-related poverty.
Millions of children die every year in the Third World because they
are too poor to buy food or medicines. Their families work extraordinary
hours to earn less than $2 a day. Filthy slums with inhumane living
conditions are prolific in most countries in the world, and are no longer
exclusive to the third world.
An estimated 100 million children live and work on the streets in the
developing world, including 40 million in Latin America. Although many
of these street children have some family links, they spend most of
their lives on the streets begging, selling trinkets, shining shoes
or washing cars to supplement their families' income. These children
rarely go beyond a fourth-grade education. The 25 million children without
families live in the streets with other street children. They sleep
in abandoned buildings, under bridges, in doorways, or in public parks.
These young victims of debt resort to petty theft and prostitution to
survive. Many are addicted to inhalants which offer them an escape from
reality and hunger pains -- in exchange for a host of physical and psychological
problems, including hallucinations, pulmonary edema, kidney failure,
and irreversible brain damage. These children are abused, even murdered,
by the people who are supposed to protect them.
"His name was Nahamán, a 13 year old in Guatemala. One night,
while walking on the streets, he was kicked to death by four policemen
who found him and decided to punish him. His crime? He was a street
kid ... a subhuman without pedigree, a vexing reminder of Guatemala's
malignant inclinations, the mortifying embodiment of a fallen society,
a scapegoat. And, in death, a martyr. When we buried Nahamán
on March 14th, 1990, his gravestone read: 'I only wanted to be a child,
but they wouldn't let me'."
While indebted countries struggle to pay mounting interest on debt loans,
their hospitals, schools, water supply, electricity, and public transport
deteriorate rapidly with reduced budgets. Disease, destitution and general
lack of sanitation characterise many Third World cities. The children
who do survive are unable to read and write as government budgets for
health and education are cut to the bone as a result of debt service.
In Niger, one of the poorest countries in the world, the government
spends three times more on debt repayment than on health and education.
Sub-Saharan Africa pays $10 billion every year in debt service. The
countries of Sub-Saharan Africa are experiencing a pandemic with terrible
consequences. In South Africa one in five people has HIV-AIDS, and in
Zimbabwe one in four. One in seven Kenyans has the virus. In Botswana,
the country with the highest rate of infection in the world, more than
one-third of all adults are HIV positive. Twenty million people, or
the entire population of Australia, have died in Sub-Saharan Africa
since the pandemic began. If current trends continue, there will be
than 40 million AIDS orphans in Africa by the end of this decade.
Despite their extreme health crisis, 23 African countries spend more
money on debt repayment than they spend on healthcare, which attracts
only $2.5 billion, or a quarter of their debt service. This does not
concern the banks that loaned the money. Their only objective is to
make their rich clients even richer. The Kenyan widow dying of aids
and leaving five orphans is not entered into the ledger books. However,
the GM food that the starving widow and her children are forced to eat
is entered into the ledger books. The humanitarian crisis has created
a market for modified food that the rest of the world didn't want. After
all, beggars can't be choosey.
By contrast, the wealthiest individuals in the world can choose or buy
anything they want. At the top of the list is Bill Gates whose net worth
in 2003 is forty billion dollars, or four times the annual debt service
of sub-Saharan Africa and sixteen times the annual expenditure on health
and education in those countries. The world's 497 billionaires in 2001
registered a combined wealth of $1.54 trillion, well over the combined
gross national products of all the nations of sub-Saharan Africa ($929.3
billion) or those of the oil-rich regions of the Middle East and North
Africa ($1.34 trillion). These five hundred people also possess greater
wealth than the combined incomes of the poorest half of humanity.
Think about that fact for just a minute. Five hundred obnoxiously wealthy
people have too much while nearly three billion people have nothing.
Allow the full meaning to play out in your mind. While five hundred
people have enough money to buy several countries, half of humanity
struggles on less than $2 a day and can barely buy enough food to stay
alive. It gets worse. Anything extra our third-world worker can earn
will go into debt service payments. The banks profit, and the shareholders
increase their wealth. The five hundred at the top of the tree have
just made a profit out of poverty.
After the G8 summit in Okinawa in 2000, President Obasanjo of Nigeria
made this comment on Nigeria's debt: "All that we had borrowed
up to 1985 or 1986 was around $5 billion and we have paid about $16
billion yet we are still being told that we owe about $28 billion. That
$28 billion came about because of the injustice in the foreign creditors'
interest rates. If you ask me what is the worst thing in the world,
I will say it is compound interest."
When President Obasanjo spoke out, the developing world was spending
$13 on debt repayment for every one dollar it received in grants.
While most
people would be aware of the debt burden of the third world, they would
be surprised to learn that the United States is also a heavily indebted
country. The accumulated debt of the world's 'richest' country, the
USA, is more than two trillion dollars. The exact amount owed by the
whole of the developing world, including India, China and Brazil, is
$2.5 trillion.
This means
that three hundred million Americans owe as much to the rest of the world
as do five billion people in all the developing countries.
The inequity doesn't stop there. While developing country economies struggle
with debt service repayments totaling more than $300 billion per year,
the US must only pay $20 billion to service an almost equivalent amount
of debt. Jubilee, an international movement working to remove the third
world debt, classifies the United States as a 'heavily indebted prosperous
country'.
If the money is not coming from the United States, where is it coming
from? Who actually owns the money that was loaned in the first place?
Some of it comes from illegal activities and is recognised as 'dirty money'.
US and European banks launder between $500 billion and $1 trillion of
dirty money each year, half of which enters the coffers of American banks.
According to Catherine Austin Fitts, a contributing editor to 'From the
Wilderness', and formerly Assistant Secretary of Housing under George
Bush, the four largest states for the importation of drugs are New York,
Florida, Texas and California. She points out that the top four money-laundering
states in the U.S. (good for between 100 and 260 billion per year in 1999)
were New York, Florida, Texas and California. The connection goes on.
Eighty per cent of all Presidential campaign funds also come from New
York, Florida, Texas and California.
While the World Bank and IMF are the main targets of activists working
to remove third world debt, these two international banking institutions
are influenced by various national banks, financial consultancies, and
former politicians who manage the wealth of the world for their wealthy
clients. The 'Group of Thirty' established in 1978 is a private, nonprofit,
international body composed of very senior representatives of the financial
private, public and academic sectors. This select group of controllers
aims "to deepen understanding of international economic and financial
issues and to examine the choices available to market practitioners and
policymakers". The most powerful decision-makers and influencers
in the financial world are members of this magic circle, which includes
major national banks, universities, former politicians, and global consultancies.
Despite the impressive collection of financial wizardry and power, The
Group of Thirty and annual Economic Summits have failed to neutralise
the terrorism of third world debt. Those who manage the global economic
system are focused on the shareholder value of banks and corporations.
The system is 'successful' as long as it returns more wealth to the wealthy.
Yet these financial experts are myopic about the future. The current level
of debt worldwide is unsustainable and must eventually lead to the total
collapse of a global economy that expects increased productivity from
the poorest and unhealthiest workers on the planet.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations
General Assembly in 1948, is built on the principle that human rights
come from the 'inherent dignity' of every person.
The Declaration states, "Everyone has the right to a standard of
living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family,
including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social
services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness,
disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances
beyond his control."
When the United Nations wrote that declaration 55 years ago, mankind was
recovering from the trauma of a world war and the horrifying genocide
of millions of innocent civilians. At that time it was necessary for mankind
to ratify basic human rights and the principle of human dignity.
The genocide happening in the third world today is even more horrifying
than the death camps in Nazi Germany. This time the objective is not to
'cleanse the master race', but to make the masters wealthier.
The banks, in pursuit of more wealth and power, terrorise the third world.
Those of us who live comfortable lives in developed countries are part
of the crime. Our lifestyle, and our expectation that our savings will
grow, feed the terrorism of debt. We might save a few dollars with the
cheap imported clothes we wear, the coffee we drink, and the oil we put
into the car; but those savings have made slaves of children and started
wars. Our humanity has been hijacked by the dollar and the pursuit of
wealth has become more important than human lives.
How then do we wage war on the 'terrorism of debt'? The Global Exchange
website suggests ten actions that will democratize the global economy.
These are not easy or quick fixes, and each action will require dedication
and persistence. The following summary is a starting point.
1. The WTO (World Trade Organisation) must be replaced by a body that
is fully democratic, transparent, and accountable to citizens of the entire
world instead of to corporations. We must build support for trade policies
that protect workers, human rights, and the environment.
2. Mandate corporate responsibility so that corporations have to prove
their worth to society or be dismantled. Now many corporations advocate
weakening of labor and environmental laws and their pursuit of free trade
has delivered a global economy of sweatshops and environmental devastation.
Corporations must be accountable to public needs, be open to public scrutiny,
provide living wage jobs, abide by all environmental and labor regulations,
and be subject to all laws governing them. Shareholder activism is an
excellent tool for challenging corporate behavior.
3. Restructure the Global Financial Architecture. Currency speculation
earns short term profits for wealthy investors but does nothing for long
term development. A tax of .1% to .25% on currency transactions would
be a disincentive for speculation, would not affect real capital investment,
and could create a huge fund for building schools and medical clinics
throughout the world.
4. Support the Jubilee action to cancel all third world debt, end structural
adjustment, and defend a country's right to make economic decisions that
will benefit the welfare of its people, not multinational corporations.
5. Prioritise human rights in trade agreements. Trade rules must comply
with higher laws on human rights as well as economic and labor rights
included in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. We should
promote alternative trade agreements that include fair trade, debt cancellation,
micro-credit, and local control over development policies.
6. Promote sustainable development, not consumption, as the key to the
progress.
International development should not be export-driven, but rather should
prioritize food security, sustainability, and democratic participation.
7. Integrate women's needs in economic structuring. Family survival around
the world depends on the economic independence of women. Economic policies
need to take into account women's important role in nutrition, education,
and development.
8. Build free and strong labor unions internationally and domestically.
The union movement needs to be reborn. As corporations increase their
multinational strength, unions are struggling to build bridges across
borders and organize globally. Activists can support their efforts and
ensure that free labor is an essential component of any 'free trade' agreements.
9. Develop community control over capital and promote socially responsible
investment.
Communities should be able to develop investment and development programs
that suit local needs including passing anti-sweatshop purchasing restrictions,
promoting local credit unions and local barter currency, and implementing
investment policies for their city, church, and union that reflect social
responsibility criteria.
10. Promote fair trade instead of free trade. We need to build networks
of support and education for grassroots trade and trade in environmentally
sustainable goods. We can promote labeling of goods such as Fair Trade
Certified, organic, and sustainably harvested.
It is time to reclaim our humanity and to 'equalize' the economy so that
we can fairly run, not unfairly ruin, our world. Economic theory will
not feed, clothe or shelter us when we have used up the last poor worker.
The current system is doomed to fail and will cost more millions of lives.
If we start now, our grandchildren will be able to enjoy a world where
human dignity is the most valued currency.
Let's start to fix it today.
--
Wanda Fish is a freelance journalist who now dedicates her writing to
the pursuit of a fair world, without wars and with equality. This article
is offered freely for distribution and publication. Wanda can be contacted
at cleverfish@eftel.com
<<
back |