

"...I could fill this page with the names of Americans who have
influenced,entertained and educated me"
. They represent what I admire about America: a vigorous originality
of thought, and a confidence that things can be changed for the better.
That was the America I lived in and enjoyed from 1978 until 1983. That
America was an act of faith the faith that "otherness" was
not threatening but nourishing, the faith that there could be a country
big enough in spirit to welcome and nurture all the diversity the world
could throw at it. But since Sept. 11, that vision has been eclipsed
by a suspicious, introverted America, a country-sized version of that
peculiarly American form of ghetto: the gated community. A gated community
is defensive. Designed to keep the "others" out, it dissolves
the rich web of society into a random clustering of disconnected individuals.
It turns paranoia and isolation into a lifestyle.
Surely this isn't the America that anyone dreamed of; it's a last resort,
nobody's choice. It's especially ironic since so much of the best new
thinking about society, economics, politics and philosophy in the last
century came from America. Unhampered by the snobbery and exclusivity
of much European thought, American thinkers vaulted forward " courageous,
innovative and determined to talk in a public language. But, unfortunately,
over the same period, the mass media vaulted backward, thriving on increasingly
simple stories and trivializing news into something indistinguishable
from entertainment. As a result, a wealth of original and subtle thought
"America's real wealth " is squandered.
This narrowing of the American mind is exacerbated by the withdrawal
ofthe left from active politics. Virtually ignored by the media, the
left has further marginalized itself by a retreat into introspective
cultural criticism. It seems content to do yoga and gender studies,
leaving the fundamentalist Christian right and the multinationals to
do the politics. The separation of church and state seems to be breaking
down too. Political discourse is now dominated by moralizing, like George
W. Bush's promotion of American "family values" abroad, and
dissent is unpatriotic. "You're either with us or against us"
is the kind of cant you'd expect from a zealous mullah, not an American
President.
When Europeans make such criticisms, Americans assume we're envious. "They
want what we've got," the thinking goes, "and if they can't
get it, they're going to stop us from having it." But does everyone
want what America has? Well, we like some of it but could do without the
rest: among the highest rates of violent crime, economic inequality, functional
illiteracy, incarceration and drug use in the developed world. President
Bush recently declared that the U.S. was "the single surviving model
of human progress." Maybe some Americans think this self-evident,
but the rest of us see it as a clumsy arrogance born of ignorance.
Europeans tend to regard free national health services, unemployment benefits,
social housing and so on as pretty good models of human progress. We think
it's important " civilized, in fact" to help people who fall
through society's cracks. This isn't just altruism, but an understanding
that having too many losers in society hurts everyone. It's better for
everybody to have a stake in society than to have a resentful underclass
bent on wrecking things. To many Americans, this sounds like socialism,
big government, the nanny state. But so what? The
result is: Europe has less gun crime and homicide, less poverty and arguably
a higher quality of life than the U.S., which makes a lot of us wonder
why America doesn't want some of what we've got.
Too often, the U.S. presents the "American way" as the only
way, insisting on its kind of free-market Darwinism as the only acceptable
"model of human progress." But isn't civilization what happens
when people stop behaving as if they're trapped in a ruthless Darwinian
struggle and start thinking about communities and shared futures? America
as a gated community won't work, because not even the world's sole superpower
can build walls high enough to shield itself from the intertwined realities
of the 21st century.
There's a better form of security: reconnect with the rest of the world,
don't shut it out; stop making enemies and start making friends. Perhaps
it's asking a lot to expect America to act differently from all the other
empires in history, but wasn't that the original idea?
Brian Eno is a musician who believes that regime change begins at home.
<<
back |