
Unfortunately,
security and liberty form a zero-sum equation. The inevitable trade-off:
To increase security is to decrease liberty and vice versa. In the
past, such trade-offs have been temporary - for the duration of the
crisis of the moment. But today, we cannot see an end to the War
on Terrorism, and that forces us to decide how secure we have to
be and how free we want to be.

Our liberty could drown in the resultant turbulence of these colliding
currents.
By delivering the speech last week himself, Bush added presidential
heft to the issue and took some of the heat off of his attorney general,
who is seen by many as the heedless champion of security at any price.
In his 2 1/2 years in office, Attorney General John Ashcroft has earned
himself a remarkable distinction as the Torquemada of American law.
Tomas de Torquemada was the 15th century Dominican friar who became
the grand inquisitor of the Spanish Inquisition. He was largely responsible
for
its methods, including torture and the burning of heretics - Muslims
in particular.
Now, of course, I am not accusing the attorney general of pulling out
anyone's fingernails or burning people at the stake (at least I don't
know of any such cases). But one does get the sense these days that
the old Spaniard's spirit is comfortably at home in Ashcroft's Department
of Justice.
The Patriot Act is much in the news, as Ashcroft and his minions seek
both to justify its excesses and strengthen them, thus intensifying
its dangerous
infringements on the Bill of Rights. There
was something almost medieval in the treatment of Muslim suspects in
the aftermath of Sept. 11. Many were held incommunicado, without effective
counsel and without ever being charged, not for days or weeks, but for months
or longer, some under harsh conditions designed for the most dangerous criminals.
It was in
the spirit of the Inquisition that the Justice Department announced
recently that it would begin gathering data on judges who give sentences
lighter than called for by legislative guidelines.
Nothing so clearly evokes Torquemada's spirit as Ashcroft's penchant
for overruling U.S. attorneys who have sought lesser penalties in capital
cases. The attorney general has done this at least 30 times since he
took office, according to the Federal Death Penalty Resource Counsel.
In several cases, Ashcroft actually has overturned plea bargains negotiated
by those government prosecutors.
The New York Times editorialized that the attorney general seems to want
the death penalty used more often.
Ashcroft is not alone in this. His boss, while governor of Texas, seemed
never to have met a death sentence he didn't like. The two of them represent
a subdivision of the Republican Party known as the "social conservatives," who
often have favored the use of government power to police moral issues
they view as modern heresies, such as abortion, homosexuality and obscenity.
They contrast with those Republicans who tend to resist such uses of
federal power and can generally be counted on to defend individual rights.
What makes this administration's legal bloodthirstiness particularly
alarming is the almost religious zeal that seems to drive it. So, what
we are seeing now is a confluence of two streams of American thought.
One of those streams represents those who believe security must have
priority over civil rights. The other stream represents those who believe
that civil rights must be preserved even as we prosecute to the hilt
the war on terrorism.
Our liberty could drown in the resultant turbulence of these colliding
currents.
-----------------------
Walter Cronkite has been a journalist for more than 60 years, including
19 as anchor of the CBS Evening News. <<
back |